Richard Reynolds

Licha v Joseph [2025] NSWCA 192

NSW Court of Appeal dismisses application for judicial review of costs orders made by the District Court against the applicants. The Court of Appeal held that the primary judge had relied upon the correct costs power, had afforded procedural fairness to the applicants and had otherwise acted within jurisdiction.

David Rayment SC and Richard Reynolds, instructed by Prandium Legal, appeared for the successful respondents. 

The judgment can be found here.

DHI22 v Qatar Airways Group QCSC (No 1) [2025] FCAFC

6 St James' Hall Counsel Dr Christopher Ward SC, Richard Reynolds and Stephanie Erian, instructed by Marque Lawyers, have successfully represented a group of women who were subjected to non-consensual examinations in Doha in 2020, whilst travelling to Australia on board a Qatar Airways Flight.

The Full Federal Court unanimously upheld the women’s appeal against an earlier decision that the proceedings be struck out on grounds that included consideration of the exclusivity provisions of the Montreal Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air.  The claims against Qatar Airways and the airport operator will now proceed to a final hearing before the Federal Court.

Separate proceedings against the Qatar Civil Aviation Authority were dismissed on grounds of foreign State immunity.

The matter has received significant press attention, including in the ABC and BBC.

Reasons for judgment can be found on the links below.

DHI22 v Qatar Airways Group QCSC (No 1) [2025] FCAFC 91

DHI22 v Qatar Airways Group QCSC (No 2) [2025] FCAFC 92